Pakeha speaks out against “White Privilege” #ArawaPartnership



(Photo: “Pro-democracy” spokesperson, Ray Macpherson, Rotorua Lakes Councilors, Mike McVicker and Rob Kent – all have voiced their strong opposition to partnering with Te Arawa)

With the Te Arawa Partnership Proposal verbal submission stage over, the Rotorua Lakes Council are now deliberating on whether to agree to Te Arawa’s proposal, go with the status quo or provide a mix of the two.

During the 5 days of submission hearings, those in attendance couldn’t help but notice a general trend, those who were against partnership with Te Arawa, in large part were male, 60-75 and Pākehā.

So when a young Pākehā woman by the name of Samantha White rose to speak, we waited, interested to know what her kōrero would be.

This woman, while being a tauiwi from the UK, who has lived her for 8 years, she quickly showed herself to have a robust understanding of the issues and one by one, lay waste to the default arguments of the Pro-democracy group.

Here is her submission in full:

Tēnā koutou katoa, ngā mihi nui ki nga tupuna hoki. Ko Samantha White toku ingao, i whanau mai ahau I ingarangi, he uri ahau no te iwi hurai me te iwi airihi, engari, kei te rohe o Te Arawa toku kainga inaianei.

Greetings to you all, acknowledgments to those who have gone before us also, I was born in England but now my home is in the region of Te Arawa.

From reading through the submissions online, those who have submitted “no” make me fear for the society I am bringing my children up in. I put to you that the no’s are showing a lack of basic understanding of the history of this country that many say we are all one of. Reality is that we are not all equal in this country.

[quote_center]We only have to look at the disengagement of Māori with politics and voting, the disproportionate numbers in the judicial system and the unemployment stats. The widening educational gap between Māori and non Māori. The educational system – one size fits all?  No. [/quote_center]

Russell Bishop’s extensive research project has proved that Māori and non Māori benefit equally from a kaupapa Māori approach whereas a westernised educational system sees the achievement gap widen. The judicial system is incorporating marae based hearings for rangatahi with success. New Zealand tourism benefits from the unique position it has with Māori.

As a relatively new citizen of Aotearoa despite understanding the negative effect of the miss history taught in schools for decades post colonisation and the westernised norm which is pushed within the media I still do not understand why when anything to do with the indigenous population is raised it appears to invite such negativity and horror from certain areas, and yet there is no bias in decision making, no racism going on… no special measures needed here thank you very much, the privileged white declare! What does the Environment Court know!

[quote_center]White Privilege now there’s a term that causes uncomfortable feelings amongst many  …but it is just a term to cover the set of assumptions about what is regarded as neutral, normal and universally accessible.[/quote_center]

James Baldwin in the 2012 Consedine book said: “the biggest problem with white privilege is the invisibility it maintains to those who benefit from it the most.” And the book goes on to say: In New Zealand white privilege evolved in colonial times where structures were put in place that were designed to meet the needs of Pākehā settlers… [and] marginalised Māori, yet these systematic structural benefits remain invisible to Pākehā.”

[pull_quote_left]Despite a promise of tino Rangatiratanga in 1840 this never eventuated, 175 years on the idea of power sharing is still anathema for many who have been victim of a miss education by the State.[/pull_quote_left]Despite a promise of tino Rangatiratanga in 1840 this never eventuated, 175 years on the idea of power sharing is still anathema for many who have been victim of a miss education by the State.

This leads to the lack of a considered “no” being offered. The no’s appear to have missed the point that the proposal is a considered one and probably have not even considered it is far from what tino rangatiratanga promised their tupuna all those years ago.

Those in the no camp appear to be ignoring the legal obligations that are placed on Council, their elected representatives. I also get the impression that these no’s seem to have little confidence in the full council’s ability to ratify decisions of committees, which have always been able to co-opt non elected people.

The proposal is not one sided, it takes into account all parties rather than just pushing forward with just the needs of 13 individual iwi in mind.

I also hope that the council’s legal obligations will be the driving force behind the decision made, as if we look to these obligations, the recognised founding document of this country and white privilege I should not be able to say to tangata whenua, those with mana whenua in this rohe: what’s wrong with the Eurocentric format we have now, your proposal is not acceptable; because we in our position of white privilege have to trust we might not have the perspective to see things from the indigenous perspective.

[quote_center]That is the trust and respect we need to show in order to move forward as one.[/quote_center]

Mana whenua have said it is the one they consider to be the most workable and that is why I implore on our elected body to do the same and continue to work towards partnership and a better, more connected society for the next generations by doing what is right and accepting the proposal; as there is no risk to democracy.

Full Council, still has the final say in this model.

[quote_center]The UN declaration of human rights promotes indigenous people’s full and effective participation in all matters that concern them.[/quote_center]

Strong New Zealand evidence is out there that one size does not fit all, and a Eurocentric approach is not the only approach. Change can cause discomfort but the discomfort doesn’t mean the change is wrong or the needs of all cannot be met. The treaty is relevant today, it is a document which allows for both the indigenous population and the non indigenous population’s needs to be acknowledged and incorporated to work together. I hope for future generations 2015 sees the Council make the right decision in the midst of a strong non indigenous majority wish for the status quo not to change, to listen to the statute they are bound by and accept what mana whenua are suggesting. To accept is to enhance democracy

Tēnā koutou Tēnā koutou Tēnā koutou katoa


  1. If the “partnership” proposal passes, the only legitimate voice and vote on the Colonial “Rotorua Lakes Council” will be Te Arawa.

    The term “partnership” nowhere appears in the Treaty. The term is tino rangatiranga — absolutely sovereignty. Sovereignty involving “partnership” with so-called “Pakeha” – Poaka / Kupapa / Waiti is no sovereignty at all. Tino Rangatira demands all sovereignty rests with Tangata Whenua: if this Wahine Poaka understood the first thing about Tino Rangatiratanga she’d never have polluted Aotearoa with her presence and her children. We will know she has a “robust understanding of the issues” when she goes back to whence she came — and takes the rest of the Waiti Poaka with her.

  2. I see Robert Payne A CONFIRMED ( REDNECK ) seeks to maintain the well trotted out bandied about lie that for some obscure reason Nga OHO – TE ARAWA — Maori would for some idiotic reasons would give away their ancient 5000 year plus Sovereignty to these lands. These are the Peoples who ancestors were giants and who via their well recorded Gigantic Transoceanic Craft sailed the planet at whim from here their Southern Base conquered the then known world thousands of years ahead of others including Chinese and at a time in this planets history when Brits and their European German Teutonic Barbarian Anglo-Saxon cousins were wearing animal skins and eating each other while living in caves. Oh, lets not forget the sacrificing children and virgins on the high moon. Yet here he is promoting what is now well known to be nothing other than a bald faced British lie, they Anglophillians being masters of the art and total willing slaves to Satan the Master liar, robber and murderer of the human race. These ignorant arrogant buggers have taught the world the Maori People were so primitive, naive and stupid as to hand their multi-millennium SOVEREIGNTY of these Islands they the Peoples of NGA OHO – TE ARAWA DISCOVERED and not STOLE to some Women…..aka….Queen from a foreign land. Note how Mr Payne failed to mention the prior 1835 Declaration of Independence by which the chief declared their sovereignty over these islands. The sheer incredulity and audacity of such beliefs which have been hammered home as being true when not is the very reason Maori History must be taught in schools, to break this so called White Mans superiority buzz they naively believe is owed to them. For what? Anyone who has done a comprehensive study of their global activities over the last 400 years will soon see these Anglos are nothing but thieves, rapist, pedophiles, killers, thieves, you name it who have wantonly raped, rampaged and pillaged the world for centuries and who continue unchecked for the moment towards bringing about the sure destruction of the planet and imminent demise of us all. Let all these so called privileged white men-women who make up less than (12%) of humanity understand one thing at this critical time in history and it is this. We the non whites who make up the bulk of mankind wishing to survive have observed how via constant misuse of such white man privilege and unearned wealth via your ingrained arrogance who control the wealth of this world and its financial system and who we see daily worldwide are engaged in activities planet-wide singly designed to destroy this world and with it the rest of humanity upon whom your arrogant superior than thou attitudes know NO RESTRAINT….. WILL SOON BE BROUGHT TO ACCOUNT. It is clear by the behaviour of these white men towards Maori over the last 176 years after stealing much of their native forest and fish etc that no real actions to save this world will eventuate and the reticence we see here towards Nga OHO-Te Arawa a Sovereign and very Ancient Peoples by the incumbent entrenched privileged whites no such compromise towards saving this world is likely to eventuate. The clock is ticking pale crew and this world is fast degrading under your greedy murderous watch and the multi-tudes are awakening from the spell of white priviledge and bi-product of the NAZI white supremest and raving fag Joseph Mengels. Remember Cecil Rhodes the Father of Apartheid was his ”favourite” student before they moved to South Africa.

    • wow.
      i am white and i never realised how much of an evil person i am until i read your words. of wisdom.
      so to sum up.
      no white person has ever done any good in the world. there culture is toilet and should be degraded at any oportunity.
      they are scum.

      i shall now go and kill myself because i am a evil person due to the colour of my skin.

  3. I applaud this woman and many, many more Pakeha should listen to what she has to say and take a good look at their privilege in society. It’s not a myth, it’s real. This woman has real integrity and good on her

  4. “The treaty is relevant today, it is a document which allows for both the
    indigenous population and the non indigenous population’s needs to be
    acknowledged and incorporated to work together”

    Yes its called ‘citizenship’ last I heard that was a unanimous term. I think there is a real misunderstanding these days about what ‘sovereignty’ is….

    Either you a subject of one sovereign and a citizen of its realm or you are the subject of another and its realm.

    You can in some cases hold dual citizenship if two sovereigns are accepting and you have natural rights to hold it in both realms, I think this half assed approach to Tino Ragnatiratanga is doing no favors to anyone and is muddying the waters.

    Sort out the core issues of statehood, citizenship and international obligations before trying to polymerize a monogamist sovereign system on any level otherwise you will end up with illegitimate offspring all over the show!

    • The core issues of statehood were sorted in Waitangi in 1840 when Maori chiefs clearly and permanently ceded sovereignty in both texts to the British in exchange for British citizenship and the protection of British common law.
      The mixed race agitators who in the past few decades have attempted to dishonour the treaty my mistranslating certain words to suit their separatist agenda are causing immense racial tension and deserve the contempt of every New Zealander with a stake in this country’s future.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.