May 10, 2021

Maori News & Indigenous Views

Crown spends millions and loses | Urewera 4 not guilty of being terrorists

5 min read
Tame Iti talks with media outside the High Court in Auckland after he was found guilty on some charges in trial regarding the Urewera Raids.  Photo / Greg Bowker Headline by 😉 (article by NZ Herald | Edward Gay)The “Urewera Four” have been found guilty of some firearms charges but the jurors were not able to reach a decision on the lead charge of belonging to an organised criminal group.

The public gallery, which has been full since the first day of the trial six weeks ago stood as the various charges were read out and the juror forewoman read out the verdicts.

Tame Iti and Te Rangikaiwhiria Kemara was found guilty of six firearms charges and not guilty of four. Urs Signer was found guilty of five firearms charges and not guilty of five. Emily Bailey was found guilty of six firearms charges and not guilty of four.

The four had been accused of being involved in military-style training camps after police raids in Ruatoki, Auckland and Wellington four years ago.

The jury forewoman said the jurors could not reach a verdict on the lead charge of belonging to an organised criminal group.

All four of the accused have been granted bail. However the legal arguments can not be reported because they were discussed in chambers.

Crown prosecutor Ross Burns said the Crown will consider a retrial on the lead charge of belonging to an organised criminal group, which the jurors could not reach a decision on.

“Ordinarily the Crown would proceed to a retrial but it will have to consider it carefully in this case.”

Tame Iti’s lawyer Russell Fairbrother said his client maintains he has done nothing wrong.

Asked about a possible retrial on the charge of belonging to an organised criminal group, Mr Fairbrother said Iti was a patient man. “He’ll wait 100 years to get this right.”

But he added that his client was pleased with the outcome of the trial.

“It’s always been a very socially and politically divisive allegation, and I think Tame is pleased with the way the defence has gone and the work that the jury’s done.”

Mr Fairbrother doubted it would proceed to a retrial.

“I can’t see the Crown evidence getting any better. That jury has worked very hard, they’ve concentrated right throughout this trial, they’ve obviously considered each charge separately and they couldn’t reach a verdict.”

Mr Fairbrother felt the trial would go down as “at least a footnote in history”.

What Tuhoe do is very much their business, and I think we’ve got to stop judging other people by our understandings. This is a country with many, many diverse cultures and many, many ranges of people and we should be able to go about our lawful business,” he said.

Emily Bailey’s lawyer Val Nisbet said the first count was “always going to be a challenge for any jury, and it will remain so.”

He said defence lawyers were not aware of whether or not there would be a retrial but that was a decision for the Crown.

“We all hope there isn’t a retrial because this has gone on enough, not only for the accused but the whole country. It needs to be put to bed,” he said.

Urs Signer’s lawyer Chris Stevenson said he would not comment because of the possibility of a retrial.

The matter will be sent to an Auckland High Court callover date next month.

The four will be sentenced on firearms charges in May.

Kemara’s lawyer Jeremy Bioletti said he was “rapt” by the result.

He said the participating in an organised criminal group charge was a “defacto terrrorism allegation” which the Crown had failed to substantiate.

“And the firearms charges were only every a holding charge that were laid when these people were first charged in October 2007 so I’m very happy with the result.”

Mr Bioletti said he would be opposing any retrial, but if it came to that “it doesn’t faze me”.

“(The belonging to an organised criminal group charge) is so nebulous that anybody can potentially be guilty of anything,” he said.

Nearly 20 hours of deliberation

The trial at the High Court at Auckland had been into its sixth week with the transcript of evidence running to over 1300 pages long.

After deliberating for about 19 hours since Thursday, the jurors returned their verdict late this afternoon.

Earlier this afternoon, Justice Rodney Hansen told the jurors that he had received their note to say they had reached verdicts on the firearms charges.

He said they could consider reaching a majority verdict on the charge of being a member of an organised criminal group, which would be 10 to one jurors agreeing on a verdict.

“If you do not think that is possible for the 10 of you to agree on a particular verdict in relation to any of the accused, I would ask you to let me know.”

Yesterday the jurors indicated they were having “some difficulty” with the organised criminal group charge and asked whether they could move on to the firearms charges.
Justice Hansen told the jurors they could consider the charges in any order that they liked.

“If it were to be the case that you had been focusing on count one [of being a member of an organised criminal group] and hadn’t at this stage commenced with the other counts in the indictment, you are perfectly at liberty to set count one aside and work through the remainder of the counts in the indictment.”

He said working through the other counts may help them to resolve any issues they had in relation to count one, the organised criminal group charge.

The jurors have photo booklets and more than 1300 pages of transcript of evidence to draw on during their deliberations.

They have also been told that they can review footage captured by covert police cameras in the Urewera bush.

The 11 jurors resumed their deliberations this morning at the High Court at Auckland.

They began sitting on Thursday and have now been deliberating for 19 hours.

They retired shortly before midday on Thursday but did not resume on Friday after one of the jurors injured herself at home.


  • * 88 witnesses for the Crown were to be called, however after arrangements with the defence only about half appeared.
  • * Four witnesses were called for Tame Iti and three for Urs Signer.
  • * The trial was set down for three months but the jury retired towards the end of the fifth week.

6 thoughts on “Crown spends millions and loses | Urewera 4 not guilty of being terrorists

  1. I think charlotte you’ve been colonised to the point where you have forgotten ko wai koe? (and probably some members of your whanau whanui ) to the point where you have forgotten about our history, the injustices that has happened to Maori across the Aotearoa for the last 150 years, and is still happening !! If you had any idea of institutionalised racism, inter personalised racism,and the events leading up to this court case you might of re-framed from making stupid unsubstantiated comments like that. The fact that you are now living in Aussie reiterates to me that you have looked somewhere else for a better life rather than support the wider issues that are happening here in NZ.Hope the shops and malls in Australia suit your needs!!

  2. This was a beat up from the start and the police were doing the bidding of plotterticians same as they are doing to old mate Dotcom.
    The raids on Tuhoe were to make Helen Clarkes resume look good for her new job at the UN and to impress visiting Americans.

    The bs with Kim Dotcom another example of Noo Theeland bending over for Uncle Sam. Interesting that the Yanks will not allow Afganistan to try the murdering scumbag Sergeant who murdered women and children as they slept yet they demand that other countries hand over people whom they deem as criminals like Kim Dotcom who has done nothing wrong or anything different to what google and youtube do every day!

  3. Who was the NZ Govt trying to impress with their own version of the imagined war on terror? What a big kiss-up! The more we stay away from the US and its tactics of agitation – the more peaceful our country will remain. We don’t need to? follow directives by a country that is famous for starting wars to enrich itself. Their system like ours is corrupt by any standard and perhaps we all should look internally and calling it the war on corruption. Then the real bad guys will be found.

  4. Charlotte why do you even bother to voice your opinion.Get an education before putting pen to paper.

  5. Um yes- police do have firearms- they were the things they held when holding mothers and children hostage during the time of this ridiculous notion of racism and ignorance. Broaden your mind Charlotte and educate your ignorance. Maybe you should watch Operation 8 and it will clear things up for you. There never was a case against the so called accused- there was only ever racism and narrow-minded thinking. To all our Maori kinfolk- you must still stand strong- though it is sad that so many of your ancestors had to sacrifice for tino rangatiratanga, and it is still as strong a need today. Charlotte- you are a very good example of why this case went ahead. Our people in NZ are not educated.

  6. How did they manage to gain firearms in the first place .. hey not even armurguard and police wear firearms .. shame on our people .. why cant you stick to the old fists fight kiss and make up .. dumbass cant even keep themselves out of court and jail .. shame on our maori kinfolk We arent ONCE WERE WARRIORS now that movie finished long ago ..What are you teaching our young people become UTU.. come to Australia and change your thinking and ways .. Go to church and learn about Jesus .. he never liked violence and he was stripped beaten and tortured he even died on the cross and yet he did nothing wrong.. only told people the truth .repent meaning change your thinking and live good decent lives .. where are the values these days.. HOw dare you stoop down that low…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.